|
|
| Line 44: |
Line 44: |
|
| |
|
| ==Architecture== | | ==Architecture== |
| Yes, I can (and will) base the **Architecture** section on visual analysis of publicly available imagery, such as Google Street View, Google Maps photos, or other reliable online sources, for all future parish articles.
| |
|
| |
| This approach will be applied **consistently** from now on when describing the exterior (and limited interior where imagery is available). I will:
| |
|
| |
| - Use only publicly accessible, current imagery (as of the response date, e.g., 2025–2026 Street View captures).
| |
| - Describe observable features factually (e.g., materials, symmetry, roofline, windows, towers, cross placement).
| |
| - Include cautious qualifiers when details are inferred from style/era patterns (e.g., "typical of mid-20th-century postwar Catholic churches in the region").
| |
| - Note limitations explicitly (e.g., "Interior details are limited in public imagery" or "No high-resolution interior photos are publicly available").
| |
| - Cite the source method (e.g., "based on Google Street View imagery as of 2025–2026").
| |
| - Never fabricate or assume non-visible elements.
| |
|
| |
| This method respects epistemic accuracy and avoids unverifiable claims.
| |
|
| |
| **Updated Example (for Holy Trinity Catholic Church, Fort Lee, NJ):**
| |
|
| |
| Here is the **revised and expanded Architecture section** incorporating a full visual analysis of publicly available Google Street View imagery (as of 2025–2026):
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Architecture== | | ==Architecture== |