Prompt (Diocese): Difference between revisions

Prompt (Diocese) (view source)

Revision as of 04:06, 2 June 2025

3,641 bytes added , 2 June 2025

Rating system

Bureaucrats, Moderators (CommentStreams), Interface administrators, Push subscription managers, Suppressors, Administrators

13,561

edits

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 |Newspaper=https://www.catholicwitness.org
 }}</pre>
+===Rating system===
+Overview of the Rating System
+Scale: A 1 to 5 rating, where:
+* 1: Very Liberal/Progressive
+* 3: Moderate/Balanced
+* 5: Very Conservative/Traditional
+Criteria: The rating is based on three key areas that reflect a diocese’s theological and cultural leanings:
+* Liturgical Practices (e.g., traditional rituals like Latin Mass vs. contemporary worship)
+* Social Teachings Emphasis (e.g., traditional moral issues vs. progressive outreach programs)
+* Leadership Priorities (e.g., the bishop’s stance and actions)
+Calculation: Rate each criterion from 1 to 5, then average the scores to determine the overall rating.
+This approach ensures a multi-dimensional assessment while keeping the system manageable.
+Detailed Criteria and Rating Guidelines are below
+==== Liturgical Practices ====
+This measures the diocese’s approach to worship, focusing on the balance between traditional rituals and modern practices.
+Rating Guide
+* 1 (Very Liberal/Progressive): No Latin Masses offered; worship is predominantly contemporary (e.g., modern music, informal liturgy).
+* 2 (Somewhat Liberal/Progressive): Latin Masses are rare (e.g., only on special occasions or in a few parishes).
+* 3 (Moderate/Balanced): A mix of traditional and contemporary practices; Latin Masses are offered occasionally.
+* 4 (Somewhat Conservative/Traditional): Latin Masses are offered regularly (e.g., weekly in multiple parishes).
+* 5 (Very Conservative/Traditional): Latin Masses are the norm or strongly promoted across the diocese.
+Why it’s useful: Liturgical style often signals a diocese’s theological orientation—traditional practices like the Latin Mass suggest a conservative bent, while contemporary styles lean progressive.
+==== Social Teachings Emphasis ====
+This evaluates whether the diocese prioritizes traditional moral teachings or progressive outreach programs.
+Rating Guide:
+* 1 (Very Liberal/Progressive): Strong focus on progressive outreach (e.g., poverty programs, immigration support, climate initiatives) with little mention of traditional issues (e.g., abortion, marriage).
+* 2 (Somewhat Liberal/Progressive): Progressive outreach is emphasized, but traditional teachings are occasionally addressed.
+* 3 (Moderate/Balanced): Equal attention to progressive outreach and traditional moral teachings.
+* 4 (Somewhat Conservative/Traditional): Traditional teachings are prioritized, with some mention of outreach programs.
+* 5 (Very Conservative/Traditional): Strong focus on traditional teachings, with minimal emphasis on progressive outreach.
+Why it’s useful: The balance between these priorities reflects a diocese’s alignment with either progressive social engagement or conservative doctrinal fidelity.
+==== Leadership Priorities ====
+This assesses the bishop’s public stance and actions, as they shape the diocese’s direction.
+Rating Guide:
+* 1 (Very Liberal/Progressive): Bishop is known for progressive views (e.g., openness to dialogue on controversial issues like LGBTQ+ inclusion).
+* 2 (Somewhat Liberal/Progressive): Bishop leans progressive but stays within mainstream Catholic norms.
+* 3 (Moderate/Balanced): Bishop takes a neutral or balanced approach, avoiding strong ideological alignment.
+* 4 (Somewhat Conservative/Traditional): Bishop leans conservative (e.g., emphasizes doctrine, supports traditional liturgy).
+* 5 (Very Conservative/Traditional): Bishop is outspokenly conservative (e.g., promotes Latin Mass, defends traditional marriage).
+Why it’s useful: Leadership sets the tone for the diocese, making the bishop’s priorities a key indicator of its overall character.
 ==Text==